FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
April 24, 2024
BOISE, IDAHO – Earlier today, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments on the Idaho Defense of Life Act, frequently referred to as the Trigger Law.
Idaho Family Policy Center filed two amicus briefs to the U.S. Supreme Court, the first in November and most recently in February, making a strong case why the Court should intervene in the ongoing federal court battle over whether key protections in the Idaho Defense of Life Act apply in hospital emergency departments.
The case stems from a Biden administration lawsuit filed last year which claims that the Idaho Defense of Life Act conflicts with federal law.
According to the Biden administration, the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) compels emergency room physicians to offer abortions that are not necessary to save the life of the mother. But this novel interpretation conflicts with the plain language of EMTALA, which is silent on the question of whether and when hospitals should provide abortions. Notably, the term “abortion” appears nowhere in the statutory text, and the law expressly instructs hospitals to treat preborn children as patients in emergency situations.
A statement from Blaine Conzatti, President of Idaho Family Policy Center:
When President Reagan signed EMTALA, he never intended that it would be used as a Trojan horse for mandatory abortion.
The language of EMTALA is clear: Emergency room physicians are required to do everything possible to save the lives of both mother and baby.
Idaho Family Policy Center is hopeful that after hearing oral arguments today, the US Supreme Court will act quickly to stop this baseless overreach by the Biden administration.
One thing is certain: Whatever their decision is, it will have a far-reaching impact for pro-life protections across the country.
Media Contact:
For questions or to schedule an interview, please contact our Communications Manager Morgan MaGill at (208) 260-5844 or [email protected].
